u--1: Lagrange Committees

Lagrange State Committees AVS on EigenLayer

Lagrange State Committees

Total restaked ($)
info
Total value of restaked assets
:
$13.80B
ETH restaked
info
Total value of restaked assets, denominated in ETH
:
3.97M
Total operators: 91

What is Lagrange State Committees?

Lagrange State Committees are a ZK light client protocol for optimistic rollups that are designed through combining EigenLayer's restaked security with Lagrange's ZK Coprocessor.

Twitter, Website, Contract, EigenLayer

address: 0x35f4f28a8d3ff20eed10e087e8f96ea2641e6aa2

Restakeable assets

Assets accepted for restaking by Lagrange Committees along with their delegated balances.

Token Balance USD Value
ETH 2.69M $9.35B
stETH 952.3K $3.31B
bEIGEN 113.1M $389.2M
ETHx 79.8K $292.8M
wBETH 27.3K $100.9M
mETH 23.2K $84.7M
swETH 19.0K $71.1M
rETH 15.5K $60.1M
cbETH 4.5K $17.2M
sfrxETH 3.5K $13.7M
ankrETH 744 $3.02M

Risk analysis
risk analysis by tokensight

AVS

Business Model

Pure Wallet
low risk

"Pure Wallet" is an EigenLayer AVS business model (the most secure one for newborn protocols) where no native AVS token is involved, and user fees are paid in a purely neutral denomination (like ETH).

Protocol Security

Code Audits & GitHub Code Coverage
low risk

Three successive audits performed by one entity. Although an overly qualitative metric, different entities performing audits would be advised.

The code coverage for this AVS is very high, although not publicly disclosed.

view audits

Operator Profile

Reputation & Entrenchment Status
high risk

Since we are at the very early stages of EigenLayer, operators' reputation was classified as unknown. Operator's entrenchment level indicates how entrenched Lagrange State Committees' operators are on other AVSs. The small number of AVSs currently live helps exacerbate this risk, in a pooled security context.

All AVSs are assigned a high operator profile risk at this early stage.

view full operator list

Lagrange State Committees Protocol

Committee State Proofs Security

Security of State Proof Generation
low risk

Any given Committee is designed to securely and provably generate cross-chain state proofs for optimistic rollups. It requires and generates inductive ZK proofs where validations are performed toward previous blocks and aggregated BLS signatures are generated to attest to the validity of the present block’s state. All these combined attributes make the system extremely robust against faults.

BLS signatures can be expensive to compute at scale. A more efficient and specialized signature scheme would be worth considering.

Prover Network Profile

Decentralization & Security Status
low risk

At least 2/3 of the present Committee must correctly sign each block. The recursive nature of State Committees enables them to ensure continuous proof validity and cross-chain relaying.

Similarly to Lagrange’s ZK Coprocessor, even in the case of a 2/3 stake attack toward the Prover network, ZK-state proof generation is not affected; only slight liveness issues may occur.

Being structured as a pure ZK system, Lagrange State Committees are extremely airtight toward potential safety exploits.

Degree of decentralization in the sequencer and the overall Prover network are unknown.

Have a question or feedback about AVS risks? Get in touch.

Operators for Lagrange Committees (top 20)

# operator group TVL
1
ether.fi ether.fi
info
ether.fi-10 - Node.Monster ($1.08B)
ether.fi-1 - Pier Two ($920.6M)
ether.fi-2 - P2P.org ($841.2M)
ether.fi-4 - Finoa ($709.3M)
ether.fi-3 - DSRV ($620.2M)
ether.fi-11 - Validation Cloud ($590.3M)
ether.fi-6 - A41 ($354.6M)
ether.fi-8 - DSRV ($286.4M)
ether.fi-5 - Cosmostation ($281.9M)
ether.fi-12 ($230.6M)
ether.fi-7 - Chainnodes ($218.1M)
ether.fi-9 - Nethermind ($112.7M)
$6.24B
2
Kelp Kelp
info
Kelp by Kiln ($998.4M)
Kelp by Luganodes ($674.8M)
$1.67B
3
EigenYields EigenYields
$1.52B
4
P2P.org [all AVS] P2P.org
$1.37B
5
Renzo Renzo
info
Renzo by Figment ($374.5M)
Renzo by HashKey ($218.7M)
Renzo by Pier Two ($213.8M)
Renzo by P2P.org ($77.7M)
Renzo by Luganodes ($14.7M)
$899.4M
6
Puffer Puffer
info
Puffer - P2P ($270.1M)
Puffer ($15.5M)
Puffer - Everstake ($6.95M)
Puffer - Hashkey Cloud ($2.50M)
Puffer - A41 ($2.38M)
Puffer - InfStones ($1.89M)
Puffer - CoinSummer ($1.47M)
$300.8M
7
Eigenpie Eigenpie
$246.6M
8
InfStones Enterprise InfStones
$239.8M
9
Swell Swell
info
Swell - InfStones ($66.5M)
Swell - P2P ($20.3M)
Swell - Luganodes ($20.2M)
Swell - Pier Two ($20.2M)
Swell - Finoa ($20.2M)
Swell - Chorus One ($20.2M)
Swell - Everstake ($20.2M)
Swell - A41 ($20.2M)
$208.2M
10
Kiln Kiln
$196.0M
11
Staked Staked
$145.0M
12
Coinbase Coinbase
$133.4M
13
CoinSummer CoinSummer
$112.5M
14
AltLayer AltLayer
$96.6M
15
HashKey
$65.2M
16
Black Sand
$51.9M
17
InfStones InfStones
$44.3M
18
stakefish
$43.5M
19
Luganodes
$43.2M
20
Nethermind
$33.4M

Research